Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16762

Mono-Symmetric I Beam Design in STAAD.PRO to AISC-360-10

$
0
0

Hi,

I want to design a mono-symmetrical I beam, with the section being an I section, but with the bottom flange wider than the top flange.  I am using AISC-360-10.

I noticed that when I define the section as a "WIDE FLANGE" section using the USER TABLE option, all bending checks are done to Section F2, which is incorrect, as this applies to doubly symmetric sections, even though I defined the bottom flange as being wider than the top flange.

However, when I change the section to ISECTION, using the USER TABLE option, the bending checks are done to Section F4, which appear to be correct, as the section is mono-symmetric.  I modelled the bottom flange as being wide than the top flange.

Can you please confirm whether:

1.  STAAD.Pro checks mono-symmetric I beams?

2.  Defining the section as an ISECTION is the proper modelling method, in order for STAAD to perform the design checks for mono-symmetric I sections, to Clause F4 and F5 of AISC-360-10?

3.  What is the difference between an ISECTION and a WIDE FLANGE beam in STAAD.PRO?

Thanks


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16762

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>