Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16762

Different Direct Analysis Results 20.07.09.31 to 20.07.11.82

$
0
0

Where I work, we have been using SELECT series 4 for a  while and are finally looking to upgrade to SELECT series 6. I am comparing the two versions and have found a significant difference in analysis results for direct analysis. 

The model below is of a Baghouse and is built up of plate and beam elements. Initial analysis was done using "PERFORM DIRECT ANALYSIS ASD". SELECT series 4 performed the analysis and was stable. I then performed the same analysis using SELECT series 6 and the results were very different.  As you can see in the images below of the displacements (at the same scale) SELECT series 6 shows instabilities whereas SELECT series 4 does not. 

SELECT series 4

SELECT series 6

The following is a series of analyses that I performed to determine where the analysis engine might have a difference.  

  1. Ran Direct Analysis (SS6 shows instabilities)
  2. Ran P-Delta Small Delta Analysis (SS6 shows instabilities, similar to 1)
  3. Ran Elastic/First Order Analysis (Results Same)

It would seem as the P-Delta analysis engine has changed between the versions. After looking at the version release notes between the two versions, I could not identify the reason why this would would happen. Maybe there has been some changes that I am unaware of?

I hope that someone here has insight on what the reason for the different results. We will most likely not be able to adopt SS6 until I can figure this out. 

Thank you for your help!


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16762

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>