Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16762

STAAD.Pro V8i Seismic Definition (IBC 2006)

$
0
0

Currently I've been doing seismic analysis for our cracking furnace.

Let's just say I was advised to consider Primary Loads 1 to 6 as seismic weights for the seismic definition. (1 to 6 are basically dead loads)

The code currently looks like this:

DEFINE IBC 2006 LOAD

ZIP *etc etc etc seismic parameters bla bla bla*

Then, for the seismic weights,

Basically I converted all the Y loads from the load cases and changed them into weights the conversion looks like this

JOINT LOAD                                                                             JOINT WEIGHT

XX XX XX XX FY -J                                                                    XX XX XX XX WEIGHT J

MEMBER LOAD                                                                       MEMBER WEIGHT

XX XX XX XX CON GY -K                                                         XX XX XX XX CON K

XX XX XX XX UNI GY -L                                                            XX XX XX XX UNI L

ELEMENT LOAD                                                                      ELEMENT WEIGHT

XX XX XX XX PR -M                                                                  XX XX XX XX PRESS M

However, I discovered an easier solution, to declare the primary load cases as reference loads BEFORE the seismic definition, and loading them as so

REFERENCE LOAD Y

R1 1.0 R2 1.0 R3 1.0 R4 1.0 R5 1.0 R6 1.0

My problem is, when I check the "PRINT STATICS CHECK" output, the values ARE NOT the same and it looks like the REFERENCE LOAD produces lower applied loads.

Any ideas?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16762

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>